The Case Of The Trolley - 1143 Words

B00733530 Judith Thomson presents us with two cases that argue for the same concept that, is killing one person to avoid the death of five moral or does this make the act of killing to save lives morally permissible? One case consists of a trolley that already has a pre-determined fate of a death occurring. The driver can both crash and continue to kill five people, or change the route to only kill one person instead. The case of the surgeon has the same premise and issues, but fate and morality has a much larger presence. The surgeon has five patients all in need of a specific organ and if they do not obtain these organs they will die. A healthy visitor walks in and it is proposed that the surgeon could kill the healthy individual,†¦show more content†¦In the case of the trolley the fate of death occurring is inevitable; whilst it is in the drivers hands as to who dies, it is also in his hands as to how many die. Thompson proposes a solution that in Bystander, we are morally permit ted to kill one in order to save five. If no action were to be done, we would be merely letting five others die. Death would regardless be an unfortunate by-product to this case, however, it is unconventionally in a humans hand on whether or not how many people actually die. In contrast, the case of the surgeon is something that can be debated morally and what Thomson proposes as a solution, is a rational and intuitional one. Beginning with the very issue of the surgeon, we are told that his five patients are in need of five specific organs, and while this is discovered, the surgeon has another healthy patient that withholds all these organs. Thomson would disagree with the killing of the healthy individual and deem it as immoral. She claims that in this situation that killing one to save more lives is not permissible, and that the solution to the trolley problem does not apply to the case of the transplant. Thomson states that a solution to the transplant is to conclude that killin g one in order to save five is still not permitted morally nor ethically; I concur that this is not a solution due to the surgeon playing God, and frankly, interfering with fate. Unlike the case of the trolley,Show MoreRelatedTrolley Dodgers Case2066 Words   |  9 PagesExecutive Summary The Trolley Dodgers was exposed that it had internal control problems existed. The other hand, found that employees embezzlement. The first part of this report identify and explain the characteristics of employee fraud indicated in Dodgers case. such as perpetrator must gains the trust or confidence of the person or company being defrauded. etc And then, the second part is explain the internal control weaknesses and understanding internal control objectives . The third part basedRead MoreThe Trolley Case : An Ethical Thought Experiment1057 Words   |  5 PagesConsequentialism The Trolley Case is an ethical thought experiment that seeks to find the â€Å"right† solution in killing people. This thought experiment explains that there is a train coming down the tracks on course to run right into five people. You stand next to a lever which can switch the tracks so that only one person will die. The only options you have are to do nothing and allow five people to die, or pull the lever so that only one person will die. In Trolley Case 2, you can save five peopleRead MoreTrolley Dodgers Case Essay examples1574 Words   |  7 PagesCASE STUDY: THE TROLLEY DODGERS 1. Identify the key audit objectives for a client’s payroll function. Comment on both objectives related to tests of control and those related to tests of control s and those related to substantive audit procedure. The key audit objectives for client’s payroll function in this Trolley Dodgers Case are: i. Occurrence ii. Completeness iii. Accuracy iv. Posting Summarization v. Classification vi. Timing i. Key Audit Objective : Occurrence DodgersRead MoreThe Trolley Problem1420 Words   |  6 Pages 1 Explain the Trolley Driver, Bystander at the Switch, Fat Man, Transplant, Hospital scenarios discussed in the The Trolley Problem reading. In doing so, address what the ethical issue(s) are in each of these scenarios. The trolley problem can be expanded to discuss a number of related ethical dilemmas, all referring to the conflicts inherent in utilitarianism and consequentialist ethics. The problem with the trolley driver scenario is that the driver is faced with a choice of whether to infringeRead MoreWhat Is And Isn t Owned. Thomson And The Trolley Problem973 Words   |  4 PagesWhat is and isn’t owned Thomson and the Trolley Problem Most people think that killing is worse than letting die. The latter is a fact. Throughout her essay, Thomson explores this idea and comes to the surprising conclusion that it is sometimes permissible to kill instead of letting die. This along with the famous Trolley Problem, first introduced by Philippa Foot, as well as a few other examples and variations, leave the reader with ambiguity on the subject: exactly under which circumstances isRead MoreThe Trolley Problem, by Judith Jarvis Thomson768 Words   |  4 PagesThe Bystander at the Switch case is a fundamental part of Thomson’s argument in â€Å"Trolley Problem.† The basis of her paper is to explain the moral difference between this case, which she deems morally permissible (1398), and the Transplant case, which she deems morally impermissible (1396). In the Bystander at the Switch case, a bystander sees a trolley hurtling towards five workers on the track and has the option of throwing a switch to divert the tro lley’s path towards only one worker. Thomson findsRead MoreThe Doctrine Of Double Effect : Writing Assignment1176 Words   |  5 Pagesjudgements. There are two different kinds of reflective equilibrium: narrow reflective equilibrium, which is when one’s intuitive judgements concerning a rather restricted set of cases is rendered consistent with a set of general moral principles, where as wide reflective equilibrium is when one’s judgement concerning a wide range of cases, both actual and hypothetical, are rendered consistent with a set of general moral principles. This method is effective in ethics so that the data, or one’s intuitive judgementsRead MoreEssay Moral Realism847 Words   |  4 Pagestheories are constantly put the test in the moral trolley and footbridge problems. In the trolley problem a runaway trolley will kill five people, but can be diverted to another track where only one individual will die. The footbridge problem is similar, but i nstead of switching tracks one would have to push a large man in front of the trolley. These cases are directly relevant to moral theory because they put human intuitions to the test. Both cases are morally difficult, how does it appear acceptableRead MoreHow The Mass And Force Affect The Acceleration Of An Object1691 Words   |  7 PagesScientific Report | Newton’s Second Law Title: How the mass and force affect the acceleration of an object. Aim: To test Newton’s seconds law if whether changing the mass or the force affects the acceleration of an object or a trolley in this case to increase or decrease. Introduction: Newton’s laws of motion are three physical laws that describe the connection between a body and the different forces acting upon it, as well as its motion in response to those forces. Isaac Newton developedRead MoreThe Law of Conservation of Momentum 1123 Words   |  4 Pagesshould equal momentum after the collision pbefore=pafter mxv before= mxv after Investigative Question How can you make use of a trolley and a ticker timer to prove that the law of conservation of momentum that states that momentum before a collision will equal the momentum after a collision is true? Hypothesis If mass pieces are used to create a collision on the trolley connected to a ticker tape going through a ticker timer and going down a reasonably frictionless ramp, then calculations of momentum